| relevant muscle activation | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
john machin
Posts : 165 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 56 Location : Cheshire, UK
| Subject: relevant muscle activation Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:19 am | |
| A friend at my gym is taking a personal training course. He's had a dispute with the teacher about which muscles are "used" during certain exercises - in particular, the bench press. The trainer is telling him the biceps muscles are "used". My friend is lol-ing. As I would. I appreciate that, in all exercises, many muscles are activated to some extent - the front raise, for instance, hits the calf muscles before any other. But saying the biceps play a significant strength role in a bench press is surely b*llocks? | |
|
| |
Pete Admin
Posts : 1279 Join date : 2009-07-26 Age : 58 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: relevant muscle activation Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:34 pm | |
| Obviously they play a part in stabilising the arm to an extent, but any serious activation would impede the triceps (a real player in the bench press). I've never heard of anyone mentioning the bi's in terms of benching. Are you sure he's not meaning triceps, but got confused? | |
|
| |
john machin
Posts : 165 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 56 Location : Cheshire, UK
| Subject: Re: relevant muscle activation Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:54 pm | |
| No, Pete: he spent some time debating this with the instructor. | |
|
| |
Pete Admin
Posts : 1279 Join date : 2009-07-26 Age : 58 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: relevant muscle activation Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:57 am | |
| OK I've had a look about & found this (it's a pdf so you need acrobat to read it). I'll now have to hold up my hands. I'd not seen this research, but basically yes the biceps are more involved in benching than I expected, again I'm not certain how it can do much more than stabilise, but maybe the stability factor of the lift puts more on the biceps than at least I suspected, so technically yep, it will 'work' the biceps to an extent, but even so I still find it hard to suggest it as a 'main' player in the move, it's function has to be to stabilise, not pull (yes you can & do work your abs using stability but biceps aren't the same thing). I think it might be an issue your mates going to have to 'play nice' with, nod his head & answer the exam question like they want, then forget about it. That'd be my advice. | |
|
| |
john machin
Posts : 165 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 56 Location : Cheshire, UK
| |
| |
john machin
Posts : 165 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 56 Location : Cheshire, UK
| Subject: Re: relevant muscle activation Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:43 am | |
| Also, using the Smith machine for benching, as most do at our gym, the stability requirement is minimal, as presumably, would be the biceps involvement. | |
|
| |
Pete Admin
Posts : 1279 Join date : 2009-07-26 Age : 58 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: relevant muscle activation Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:47 am | |
| The idea might be it's like one of those 'trick' questions, so the teacher is preparing. Also stabilisation is more than balance, it's holding the elbow (& probably more importantly in this case) the shoulder (glenohumeral joint) stable. I mean in terms of exercise stimulus I believe your friend is right, but in terms of medical accuracy the trainer is right. As I said he probably needs to remember it for the exam, but then forget it as a relevant fact (except of course in injury/rehab situations where again it might be important) | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: relevant muscle activation | |
| |
|
| |
| relevant muscle activation | |
|